Showing posts with label molecules. Show all posts
Showing posts with label molecules. Show all posts

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Quantum Space

BIG PROPELLER-CHIP BRAIN SPACE EXPLORATION
BIG BRAIN CREATES QUANTUM WORLDS DIVISION FOR STUDY OF QUANTUM  SPACE

The Big Brain has formed the Quantum Space Division, i.e. The Quantum Worlds Exploration Division, which will explore strange new worlds that exist beyond the microscopic space end of the size spectrum. The project will explore perplexing "quantum world things" that traverse past the increasingly small realm of nanotechnology, and zoom deep down within the embedded and perhaps limitless infinitely shrinking zonal space of the ultimately weird and not-understood Quantum Effects.

According to research sources, i.e. Quantum Reflection

The purpose is to create a platform for exploring the phenomenon of quantum reflection, taking and applying Quantum Reflection to a level incorporating added dimensional Quanta and to theoretically represent their predicted or simulated behaviors and effects.
 

TOOLS
Even when dealing with the theoretical, special research tools are required for experimentation, simulation and investigation of various scientific principles. For this reason, the QuadLyzer was invented and built.

Quantum Reflection
university.iosonofabio.fastmail.fm/talks/Quantum_Reflection.pdf

Quantum reflection is a classically counter intuitive phenomenon whereby the motion of particles is reverted "against the force" acting on them. This effect manifests the wave nature of particles and influences collisions of ultra-cold atoms and interaction of atoms with solid surfaces.

Quantum reflection of cold atoms from surfaces occurs on the attractive tails of long-range atom surface potentials, and takes place at mesoscopic distances on the order of a fraction of a micron.

Because of that, studies of quantum reflection are closely related to studies of the long-range atom-surface interactions and contribute to our understanding of the interface between quantum world and the macroscopic world in general.


Observation of quantum reflection has become possible thanks to recent advances in trapping and cooling atoms. Utilization of this effect has only begun and holds many exciting promises. The goal of the workshop is to present the recent results and applications of quantum reflection in the areas of atomic, molecular, optical and surface physics, and to discuss its potential for science and technology, notably for the understanding of quantum mechanics, for realization of experiments testing quantum electrodynamics and gravity, and for applications in the fields of quantum optics and nanotechnology.

Institute for Theoretical Atomic Molecular and Optical Physics
http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/itamp/


MESOSCOPIC
Mesoscopic physics is a sub-discipline of condensed matter physics which deals with materials of an intermediate length scale. The scale of such materials can be described as being between the size of a quantity of atoms (such as a molecule) and of materials measuring micrometers. The lower limit can also be defined as being the size of individual atoms. At the micrometer level are bulk materials. Mesoscopic and macroscopic objects have in common that they both contain a large number of atoms. Whereas average properties derived from its constituent materials describe macroscopic objects, as they usually obey the laws of classical mechanics, a mesoscopic object, by contrast, is affected by fluctuations around the average, and is subject to quantum mechanics.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoscopic_physics

In other words, a macroscopic device, when scaled down to a meso-size, starts revealing quantum mechanical properties. For example, at the macroscopic level the conductance of a wire increases continuously with its diameter. However, at the mesoscopic level, the wire's conductance is quantized - the increases occur in discrete, or individual, whole steps. During research, mesoscopic devices are constructed, measured, and observed experimentally and theoretically in order to advance understanding of the physics of insulators, semiconductors, metals, and superconductors. The applied science of mesoscopic physics deals with the potential of building nano-devices.


SIZE OF MESOSCOPIC

There is no rigid definition for mesoscopic physics, but the systems studied are normally in the range of 100 nm (the size of a typical virus) to 1 000 nm (the size of a typical bacterium). 100 nanometers is the approximate upper limit for a nanoparticle.

From Discussion
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=560069
Quantum mechanics basically takes the wave mechanics of classical physics and applies it to individual particles. There are a few differences that crop up when you do this, but I think the main concept here carries over pretty well-- the concept of interference. In classical wave mechanics, we have Huygens' principle, which says that every part of a wave acts like sources for how the wave evolves forward in time. Also, we have the "superposition principle", which says that every solution to the wave equation that comes from one source just adds up with the solutions that come from all other sources. This means in classical waves, the waves get a high total amplitude wherever there is constructive interference, and low total amplitude wherever there is destructive interference.


SUPERPOSITION PRICIPLE

In quantum mechanics, we also have a superposition principle, except now it applies to individual particles. It basically says that anything that we can describe as something that can happen to an individual particle can happen in superposition, so what 'actually happens" is a kind of constructive sum over all these "possible happenings." This is the spirit of the Feynman path integral approach, for example. So using this mathematics, what has a high probability of happening is what receives constructive interference over this sum, and what has low probability is what destructively interferes. This is a key point-- each individual term in the sum starts out equally likely, even ones that correspond to absurd behavior, but the absurd behaviors cancel each other out, sort of like monkeys voting in an election.

In the case of reflection, we find that the presence of the mirror allows a certain behavior to receive constructive interference, which would not if the mirror were not there. The new behavior is "angle of incidence equals angle of reflection", and the mathematical property of that type of solution is that it exhibits "stationary phase." Stationary phase means the phase of the type of process (so how quickly the amplitude of the process varies over the set of very similar processes) is not varying over the physically allowed process, but does vary rapidly as soon as you test a non-physical process. Thus, the "angle of incidence equals angle of reflection" gives an extremum in the phase as you vary over a range of possible processes-- in this case, it is the minimum time to get between specified points A and B. Without the mirror, the only minimum time is the straight line between them. With the mirror, a second possibility emerges, the local minimum in time that comes from an equal angle of incidence and angle of reflection path between A and B that glances off the mirror. (It takes more time than the straight shot, but less time than all its neighboring paths, so it exhibits stationary phase and so constructive interference when you add the neighboring amplitudes.)

This still doesn't answer what the mirror is doing that allows for this new stationary phase solution. The classical answer to that is that the mirror acts like a source of waves that cancel the incident wave within the mirror, and constructively interfere to make a reflected wave. Quantum mechanically, the mirror creates a boundary condition on the photon wave function that forces the wave function to go to zero at the surface of the mirror, and this constraint suffices to give the reflected wave when you apply the superposition of wave functions analyzed in terms of all the modes that obey that constraint and have the energy of the incident wave. You could even do it with quantum field theory, and one way to picture that would be to say that the incident photon is destroyed by the mirror, but its energy must be accounted for, and since the mirror is elastic, it must use the energy to promote a "virtual photon" to the status of a real photon. What's more, the virtual photon not only has to have the energy of the original photon, it must also have a wave function that resonates constructively with the original photon-- in other words, it is indistinguishable from the original photon, so is ruled by the same wave function, and that wave function must experience constructive interferece (for all the above reasons) to have a reasonable probability of actually happening.

So you may be surprised to find there is not just one answer to your question, and there might be new possible answers in a few more centuries, but the key idea is constructive interference set up by the way the mirror is required to prevent the photon from crossing its flat surface, yet energy is also required to be conserved. Generally, we're happy if we have one way to think about it that gives good results and seems simple enough for us to understand.

Quantum mechanical tunneling and reflection simulation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cV2fkDscwvY

What is Quantum Tunneling?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=fvwp&v=cTodS8hkSDg

More Links
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_reflection

Quantum Reflection from an Atomic Mirror
george.ph.utexas.edu/papers/reflection_atomic_mirror.pdf


Counter-Intuitive the Laws of Quantum Physics
Researchers at the Fritz Haber Institute in Berlin report on the observation of a text-book quantum effect that nicely reveals how counter-intuitive the laws of quantum physics can be. Considering only classical mechanics, a particle moving towards a cliff would, inevitably, fall over (and down) the cliff wall, simply because the force is acting in this direction. In stark contrast, the wave-particle-duality of quantum physics allows for a particle (e.g., an atom or molecule) to bounce back from the edge of the cliff unscathed. This is known as quantum reflection and is responsible for the observation of non-destructive reflection of the weakest bound molecule known, the helium dimer, from a reflection grating. The findings have been published in the journal Science.

http://presse.fhi-berlin.mpg.de/832?lang=en
http://presse.fhi-berlin.mpg.de/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/brevia5.jpg

Artist’s view of quantum reflection of a diatomic helium molecule in front of a solid surface. The attractive force between the surface and the helium dimer (van-der-Waals force) forms a deep canyon in front of the hard wall. The helium dimer survives this impact, because the dimer actually never comes into this canyon but bounces off the edge of the cliff.

Quantum reflection of ultracold atoms from thin films, graphene and semiconductor heterostructures
http://iopscience.iop.org/1367-2630/13/8/083020/fulltext/

 http://www.staff.ncl.ac.uk/nick.parker/images/SOL2.jpg

BRIGHT SOLITARY MATTER WAVES:  The quantum wavefunction of a BEC satisfies a nonlinear Schrodinger equation.  Under attractive atomic interaction, self-trappedwaves of matter known as bright solitary waves can be supported.

 Sufficiency conditions for quantum reflection
http://iopscience.iop.org/0295-5075/51/4/381


http://ej.iop.org/images/0295-5075/51/4/381/Full/img26.gif

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Powerful Microscopes

THE SCIENCE OF POWERFUL MICROSCOPES

ELB @ Elect Lens Boost
GMM - Humanoido Labs
GENIUS MOLECULAR MICROSCOPE
The Genius Molecular Microscope (GMM) was invented in September
of 2012 by the Big Brain Molecular Microscopy Initiative at Humanoido Labs and works by the cascation of processing data amplification to reach field magnification levels exceeding one million times. GMM is designed as an easy to use and inexpensive way to view molecular structures, to work with and design micro machines and objects within the chip, and to explore the effectual results of the nanoscopic and nanotechnology developments.

http://humanoidolabs.blogspot.tw/2012/09/genius-molecular-microscope-gmm.html


ELECTRON MICROSCOPE
The electron microscope, first developed by German engineers Ernst Ruska and Max Knoll in the 1930s, uses a particle beam of electrons to illuminate a specimen and create a highly magnified image. Electron microscopes yield much greater resolution than the older light microscopes; they can obtain magnifications of up to 1 million times, while the best light microscopes can magnify an image only about 1,500 times. An electron microscope can range from US$90,000.00 to half a million dollars.


THE SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPE
The scanning tunneling microscope (STM) is among a number of instruments that allows scientists to view and manipulate nanoscale particles, atoms, and small molecules. It was invented by Gerd Binig and Heinrich Rohrer in 1986. The idea of Scanning Tunneling Microscopy STM comes from the “topografiner” developed in the early 1970’s (Young et al., 1972), that included most of the elements of an STM but can only operate with a larger tip-to surface gap (>1 nm, at which distance electron transport occurs via field emission). Deficiencies in both the mechanical and electrical systems at 1970’s limited the resolution to a few nanometers vertically and ~0.5 μm laterally. These problems were overcome ten years later by Binnig and Rohrer at the IBM Rüschlikon laboratory. They succeeded in creating an instrument with stable vacuum tunneling and precision scanning capabilities – the conditions required for atomic resolution imaging. STM has revolutionized the study of surfaces and is rapidly becoming a required tool in almost every surface characterization laboratory. In addition, it has led to the development of a host of related techniques, collectively known as scanning probe microscopy (SPM).


http://conf.ncku.edu.tw/research/articles/e/20080606/5.html


ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPE
Atomic force microscopes (AFMs) gather information by "feeling" the surface with a mechanical probe. Gerd Binig, along with Calvin Quate and Christoph Gerber, developed the first AFM in 1986. Product Example: The package include the technical integration of an AFM into an imaging ellipsometern of the nanofilm_ep3 series. Take advantage of the convenience of imaging ellipsometry to visualize thin films and surface structures, and then zoom into nanometer details with Scanning Probe Microscopy on the same spot! The integration is done by an intelligent sample handling, integrating complementary data from two independent methods without the need for laborious sample positioning. The technical integration of a Scanning Probe microscope enables the user to: * measure the same field of view with imaging ellipsometer and scanning probe microscope * observe nano-steps in the live contrast-image of the ellipsometer, draw your region of interest around the nano-steps, and record surface film thickness, profiles/maps with nanofilm_ep3 (large field of view, quick) or by the AFM (submicron lateral resolution, slow ~ 3 min for an 80 µm by 80 µm scan) * map thickness and optical properties (refractive index/extintion) and 3D-profile/surface-roughness at the same sopt on a sample within minutes, due to software-controlled sample transport between imaging ellipsometer and Atomic force microscope with smaller than 20 µm accuracy and 2 µm repeatability


http://www.directindustry.com/prod/accurion-gmbh/atomic-force-microscopes-afm-71503-606558.html

LINKS
http://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/what/seeing-nano

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Molecular Microscopy Initiative

BIG BRAIN INITIATIVE
MOLECULAR MICROSCOPY INITIATIVE


Delving into the Macroscopic, the Big Brain begins a new initiative to look into new worlds of microscopic machines and molecular constructs. For this, the Brain needs a new and more powerful microscope. Previously the Big Brain used the Surface Mount Microscope, a camera based device that optically imaged processor boards with surface mount components.

For the Molecular Microscope Initiative, a new kind of microscope is needed. The requirements include showing the components inside a chip, showing built machines and objects in a chip, and exploring Nanotechnology. For these purposes, the Big Brain intends to invent a new microscope with the following guidelines and features:

* minimal or no parts
* no mechanical components
* utilizes over 720 processors
* black & white and/or color imaging
* can rival and sub for an Electron Microscope
* can replace an electron microscope
* designed to show larger molecular structures
* uses simple yet clever construction
* easy to use
* simple or no setup
* no cost
* quickly implemented
* built from common elements
* capable of showing nano machines
* can show the machines & objects inside a chip
* can view the microscopic chip structure
* vast magnifying capabilities from 100X to one million times
* built in a relatively short time period
* operated by Big Brain supercomputer